Faith, Health and
Prosperity
Andrew Perriman, ed.
Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 2003
316 pages $23
By DANIEL KOH KAH SOON
WHAT do Kenneth Hagin, Kenneth
and Gloria Copeland, Morris Cerullo, Benny Hinn and Rhema Bible
College have in common?
They are American-based with influence stretching all over the
world through their publications, tapes and television programmes.
They are better known, however, as the main proponents of what
has now been commonly referred to as the Word-Faith movement,
also variously described as "Word of Faith", "Positive
Confession" and "Health and Wealth Gospel".
In recent years, as the "Health and Wealth Gospel" begins
to attract more followers, more mainline church members and pastors
are now buying their books and promoting their teachings.
Many Word-Faith preachers have Pentecostal root. But their teachings,
influenced in many ways by the mystic E. W. Kenyon whose works
were plagiarised by Hagin, are at odds with today's mainstream
Assemblies of God. Mainstream Pentecostals, represented by widely
respected scholars like Gordon D. Fee and Wonsuk Ma, are not afraid
to engage in responsible in-depth theological exploration and
the pursuit of excellence in biblical scholarship, something which
the Word-Faith preachers have no interest in. They eschew rigorous
theological inquiry and are satisfied with making assertions and
building their teachings on suspect grounds.
It should be said,
nevertheless, that the Word-Faith teachings do have able supporters.
The best defence of the movement is provided by William DeArteaga
in Quenching the Spirit, (Creation House). However, fair-minded
Christians who are sympathetic to the charismatic expression of
faith, like Bruce Barron, in The Health and Wealth Gospel, (IVP),
Gordon Fee, in The Disease of the Health and Wealth Gospels, (Regent
College), and Robert Bowman, Jr, in The Word-Faith Controversy
(Baker), have critiqued the dangerous claims of the Word-Faith
proponents and the superficiality of their teachings. Other voices
taking a more critical approach like D. McConnell, A Different
Gospel (Hendricksen), Dave Hunt and T. A. MacMahon, The Seduction
of Christianity (Harvest House) and Hank Hanegraaff, Christianity
in Crisis, (Harvest House), have judged the teachings of the Word-Faith
movement to be New Age and cultic.
The books mentioned above represent a fair spectrum of views on
the controversies emanating from the Word-Faith teachings. Ideally,
Christians should read all the books cited plus the books authored
by the leading Word-Faith preachers. But if there is just one
book to read - one that is helpful, thorough, and gives a balanced
assessment of the Word-Faith teachings - it is the book under
review.
This book, commissioned by the Evangelical Alliance of UK, is
the fruit of a study done by a group of British theologians. Part
one of the book surveys the main teachings and history of the
Word-Faith movement. Part two examines the claims of the Word-Faith
preachers. It evaluates the way the preachers have interpreted
the Bible, where they might have erred in interpretation and where
they might have been selective in their choice of texts to propagate
their teachings.
To their credit, the authors acknowledge that Hagin et al have
a few lessons which the church can learn from. However, the findings
of the study group have uncovered serious errors in interpretation
and teachings. There are also valid questions raised on ethical
issues which Word-Faith preachers have got themselves into but
have not adequately addressed.
Doctrinally, the main contention is the teachings about Christ,
His atonement and our identity as Christians. This impinges on
our understanding of soteriology and the practice of faith.
Did Jesus die a second death, as the preachers seem to suggest
that He did? How much are we the same as Christ? And do we share
the same authority which Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of
God exercised? Are we "incarnate", as the preachers
seem to say we are, the way Jesus is recognised by the Church
as the Incarnate Son of God? Is salvation an invitation to material
wealth and good health?
If Copeland's illustration of salvation as a ticket that pays
for all the luxury and first-class meals in a cruise is to be
taken seriously, is salvation then a free ticket for all to lay
claim on all the material benefits in this world?
There is a widespread teaching that impresses on followers to
give in faith and expect a one hundred-fold return. Scripture
is (mis)used to support such teaching. Pause for a while and ask
a simple question. In practice who are the main beneficiaries
of the health and wealth gospel? Are they not, first and foremost,
the preachers themselves and the ministries owned by them? Are
they not serving their own interest - even if this is not disclosed
or is denied - for them to continue asking for generous giving
couched in terms of supporting their ministries?
The Rev Dr Daniel Koh Kah Soon is the District Superintendent (West) of Trinity Annual Conference (TRAC) and a lecturer at Trinity Theological College.